2013年考研英语一答案？12.【答案】C【解析】此外明显缺一个过去分词作interviews的定语,再看by后面的officers,只有conducted(执行),符合语境,故为正确答案。那么，2013年考研英语一答案？一起来了解一下吧。
这个句子主干部分为people will only start shopping moe sustainabl...，从句为when 引导的条件状语从句，该从句为省略句，not to 后省略了主句中的shop more substainably. can't afford not to 两个not ，双重否定。
翻译为：只有当人们支付不起不能消费的的时候，才会进行可持续消费。
text1
在 2006年的电影《穿普拉达的女魔头》中，梅丽尔·斯特里普扮演的米兰达•普瑞斯特利指责她那毫无吸引 力的助理认为高级时装并未感染到她。Priestly解释了这些年来，助理毛衫的那种深蓝色是如何从时尚秀场走向 百货商店，又走向廉价服装店的，无疑，这个穷女孩的衣服就是在那儿买的。
时尚业这种自上而下的概念已经过时了，与伊丽莎白·克莱恩在《过分打扮》一书中所描绘的狂热世界存 在着差异。这本书是她长达三年对“快速时尚”的控诉。近十年的时间中，技术进步使得大规模市场品牌，如 Zara, H&M 和优衣库等对于潮流趋势的反应更加速度，并且能更精确预测市场需求。快速的转变意味着浪费的 库存减少了，新品发布更加频繁，并且能获得更大的利润。这些品牌鼓励那些有时尚意识的顾客们将服装视作 是一次性的——也就是只洗一两次就不要了，尽管这些品牌并未宣传这一点——并且鼓励他们每隔几周就更新 自己的衣柜。通过提供非常便宜的时尚单品，克莱恩认为，这些品牌掠夺了时尚圈，撼动了这个早就适应了季 节性周期的行业。
这次革新的受害者们，当然，不仅仅限于设计师们。对 H&M 来说，要在全球 2300多家店里销售价格 5.95 美元的针织迷你裙，它必须依赖于低廉的海外劳动力，必须成批大量订购，而这使得自然资源紧张，并且使用 数量众多的有害化学品。
根据查询中国研究生招生信息网得知，拿督适中。
2013年考研英语一的难度整体适中，阅读部分第一篇和第四篇难度稍大。从阅读来看，文章比较新颖，主要来源于2012年的报刊杂志，如《经济学人》和《华尔街日报》，文章内容比较新颖，特别是第一篇关于时尚的文章，出现了大家耳熟能详的商业品牌。
answer to
1.
(对刺激)起反应，对…有反应；响应；产生做用(或效果):
The cow answered to its cowboy's touch.
牛对牛仔的轻击做出了反应。
2.
对(…的称呼)做出反应；名叫，叫做：
The child answers only to its nickname.
你只有叫那孩子的外号，他才答应。
3.
负有责任，对…负责，为…的后果负责，须做交代，对…负责做出解释，向…负责说明：
The directors had to answer to the stock holders for loss.
该损失董事们要向股东做出交代。
4.
与(描述等)相符，和…相合；像：
He answers to the description.
他与描述相符。
5.
适合于，符合：
That answers precisely to our need.
那正符合我们的需要。
6.
(飞机、船、汽车等)对…做出反应；听从(使唤、控制)，服从：
The sails are not answering to our pull on the ropes.
我们拉绳风帆不听使唤。
Text 4
On a five to three vote,the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona's immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Aministration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the federal government and the states.
An arizona.United States,the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona's controversial plan to have state and local police enfour federal immigrations law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Anturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.Arizona had attempted to fashion state police that ran to the existing federal ones.
Justice Anthony Kennedy,joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's liberals,ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun .On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately "occupied the field " and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal's privileged powers
However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.
Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.
The 8-0 objection to President Obama tures on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”. The White House argued tha Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.
Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government,and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status,it could.It could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn't want to carry out Congress's immigration wishes,no state should be allowed to do so either.Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
36. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they
[A] deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.
[B] disturbed the power balance between different states.
[C] overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.
[D] contradicted both the federal and state policies.
37. On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?
[A] Federal officers’ duty to withhold immigrants’information.
[B] States’ independence from federal immigration law.
[C] States’ legitimate role in immigration enforcement.
[D] Congress’s intervention in immigration enforcement.
38. It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition Acts
[A] violated the Constitution.
[B] undermined the states’ interests.
[C] supported the federal statute.
[D] stood in favor of the states.
39. The White House claims that its power of enforcement
[A] outweighs that held by the states.
[B] is dependent on the states’ support.
[C] is established by federal statutes.
[D] rarely goes against state laws.
40. What can be learned from the last paragraph?
[A] Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.
[B] Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.
[C] Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.
[D] The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.
以上就是2013年考研英语一答案的全部内容，text1 在 2006年的电影《穿普拉达的女魔头》中，梅丽尔·斯特里普扮演的米兰达•普瑞斯特利指责她那毫无吸引 力的助理认为高级时装并未感染到她。Priestly解释了这些年来，助理毛衫的那种深蓝色是如何从时尚秀场走向 百货商店，又走向廉价服装店的，无疑，这个穷女孩的衣服就是在那儿买的。内容来源于互联网，信息真伪需自行辨别。如有侵权请联系删除。
